Leiden University has been exceptionally successful in moot court competitions this academic year. So what are the advantages of doing a moot court – and possibly: what’s the key to success?
The International Commission of Inquiry for North Korea is mandated to investigate human rights violations. However, it is unlikely that its investigation will lead to prosecutions. What then might be the practical impact of its report?
In our rapidly changing society, the legislative process has to cope with increasing demands. In particular, speeding up the Dutch legislative process appears to be a pressing topic.
In 2010, Ukraine adopted its first data protection law, which, as some suggested, imposed disproportionate limitations on the freedom of expression. In late 2012, amendments followed – will they help resolve the issue?
No we do not have a constitutional court. But we do have the European Convention, and the European Court of Human Rights. Which, by the way, also has an increasingly ‘constitutional’ task and engages in ‘constitutional reasoning’.
Regulation 261/2004 was adopted to provide air transport passengers with more rights against airlines in cases of delay and cancellation. This Regulation led to a number of questions and issues which have been ‘solved’ by the CJEU rather creatively.
A key question regarding the European integration process is how much national sovereignty should be transferred to the EU or, differently put, how much shall the EU do?
To mark the occasion of professor Paul Van der Heijden’s return to Leiden Law School as professor of International Labour Law, a symposium entitled ‘The value(s) of labour law' has been organized today.
State aid reform hopes to achieve more results with less aid. The Commission also hopes to monitor state aid more effectively with less (or at least not more) man-power. Will that work?
Methodological soul-searching should not lead legal scholars to becoming ‘light’ economists. Instead we should rethink the role of social sciences in our own discipline.
Date of birth, address, credit card number…the list goes on. When shopping online, we share this data on a regular basis. Yet what may happen to this data beyond a particular transaction, and what decisions could be made based on this data?
This Wednesday the Leiden Law School will host the third annual Jonge NJV Seminar. The Jonge NJV invites legal scholars and practitioners, young or not so young, to join us at the Law Faculty for an interesting debate on ‘the general interest’ in law.
Blogs should be just a little provocative. So let’s provoke: the idea that breaches of State aid law can be solved by national courts is nice, but wrong. Enforcement by national judges, rather than the European Commission, is costly, clumsy and ineffective
While in 2010 the European Parliament gave a green light to the EU-US TFTP agreement, recently MEPs critically questioned the Commission on its implementation. What went wrong with the banking data sharing deal?
In a greying labour market, active ageing is necessary. We need to work to a higher age. A prohibition of age discrimination has too little effect, though.
Last week Twitter blocked the user account of the neo-nazi group ‘Besseres Hannover’ for German users. The account was blocked at the behest of the German authorities, because the group is illegal in Germany.
The EU, and in particular the Eurozone, is facing a political, economic and monetary crisis. Many people are asking the question why some states were allowed to join the Union in the first place.
On 10 October USADA published a Report on Proceedings and a Reasoned Decision in the case of USADA against the cyclist Lance Armstrong. Bringing evidence from various sources, USADA also dealt with the issue of the sufficiency and reliability of evidence.
According to minister Opstelten, new investigatory measures are needed to fight cyber crime more effectively. What human rights standards should national authorities take into account in order to comply with the requirements as developed by the ECtHR?
The Child Law Department has produced a new report on the rights of street children in an exciting new partnership bringing the work of academia and the NGO world together, to support the 2012 International Children’s Peace Prize.
Most socio-economic rights are non-justiciable and considered second-rate. It is often attempted to improve the status of these rights, but how about further exploring the protection of economic and social rights via civil and political rights?
The changing rules for Dutch cabinet formation demonstrate that the Netherlands is a polity in transition, possibly also developing in the direction of a ceremonial monarchy and a majoritarian democracy. What’s at stake?
The Netherlands is required to introduce the golden rule – a balanced budget rule – in national law. In a recently tabled bill the Dutch government will comply with this European obligation. However, some critical remarks can be made about this new bill.
Dutch governments are going to cut back on the granting of subsidies. Although this can have substantial consequences for the recipients of subsidies, it can also lead to other, more creative manners being developed to finance an organisation.
In April, the ICC Prosecutor declined to take a decision on Palestine’s declaration accepting the Court’s jurisdiction. In November, it will be for the Assembly of States Parties to examine the issue.
The Additional Protocol to the Child Rights Convention offers children the opportunity to make complaints on violations of their rights before the Committee on the Rights of the Child. There is room for improvement to involve children in the procedure.
Today's society could be considered a data society. Large amounts of digital data are being generated every day. But are the issues that come with all this data properly addressed by current legislation?
Polls for the general elections on 12 September indicate that it will prove difficult to cement a majority coalition in the Netherlands. Political fragmentation is increasingly destabilizing Dutch politics. Maybe electoral thresholds need to be considered.
The Council and Parliament of the EU are engaged in the biggest clash in their history. The Parliament risks being excluded from the legislative process concerning reforms of the Schengen Agreement. Why is nobody paying it any attention?
The critics of controversial ACTA have been saying its ratification could be a major blow to privacy on the Internet. Under ACTA, could private parties such as rightholders and Internet Service Providers become the ‘watchers’ of Internet users?
From private owned launchers to private missions into deep space, governments are no longer the sole promoter of space activities. As crowd funding for small-scale space projects becomes a reality, some legal questions arise
Research in the Humanities is undervalued and as a result, underfunded. In order to change that, our democracy needs to change and develop more ‘aristocratic’ attitudes, at least where science is concerned.
Proudly stating that the Netherlands is a tolerant country where ‘everyone is free to wear what they want’ neglects women who are oppressed, even if there are only a few.
On 28 June 2012 the Dutch Safety Board published a report on the ‘DigiNotar incident’, in which it concludes that the public executives of many government agencies in the Netherlands do not exercise sufficient control to ensure proper digital security.
The Kosovo advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice was delivered on 22 July 2010. Two years later, it’s time to look at its long-term impact.
Courts are obliged to assess the fairness of contractual terms to protect a consumer, even if the consumer does not show up in court. The European Court confirmed this obligation, without a clue how courts are to know that the absent party is a consumer.
The Petition Committee is currently holding an internal review of the citizens’ initative. This instrument may only work if it is accompanied by a long-term vision of how parliament is to be re-established as the central organ of representative democracy.
On 6 June, the European Commission (Commission) presented a proposal for a Crisis Management Directive (CMD) to develop a common framework for the recovery and resolution of banks and investment firms. Lessons learned from the financial crisis?
The Dutch Act on public procurement almost seemed to have had lost all support from the relevant stakeholders. Extensive discussion were needed to keep them from withdrawing their support.
Eurozone leaders recently decided that the ESM should expand its powers and provide direct aid to banks. Is this allowed under the current ESM treaty or is a treaty change (and thus a new round of ratification of national parliaments) necessary?
Facebook users can now not only message each other, but use the Facebook email, recently introduced by the social network. How can users benefit from this change, and to what extent does it affect their privacy?
Interest amongst judges for State aid law seems to be limited. This is unfortunate, because State aid law is arguably fundamental to EU law. On the other hand… who can really blame them?
Many Dutch companies receive financial or other support from the state. The goal of these policies is to strengthen the Dutch economy. But the use of state support is increasingly being linked to the observance of international labour standards.
Last Monday, Sheik Al-Haddad from the London Sharia Council advocated the establishment of a Sharia council in the Netherlands, in order to help Dutch women in Islamic divorce procedures. To follow this advice would be a grave mistake.
The ECtHR nowadays uses a more procedural approach when assessing an alleged human right violation. What lessons can be learned from experiences in Dutch administrative law with a procedural approach?
How much flexibility should we allow the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in order to provide for protection of important interests? The example of the Italian waste crisis and how it led to a violation of the European Convention.
No matter whether one views the EU as constitutional or administrative in character, its democratic legitimacy has come under increasing pressure, the reason being the separation of power and legitimacy and the collapse of political messianism respectively
Public records, banking information, correspondence…the list of data accessed by police would be incomplete without Passenger Name Records. The new EU-US PNR agreement will enter into force soon – will it also bring a higher data protection standard?
When dealing with State aid matters, national judges and the European Commission have 'essential, but distinct, roles'. This distinction seems to be blurring, as recent Dutch case law shows.
Increasingly, the Dutch government has to deal with the distribution of limited permits or grants. A recent case shows that errors and mistakes made during award procedures used to allocate these public rights can be difficult to remedy.
Today the Rutte-Verhagen cabinet, now under resignation, debated on the crisis. There will be a general election but there is controversy about the date. Professor Voermans considers the arguments and requirements of the Dutch Election Law.
The present Dutch cabinet crisis gives rise to difficult problems: how is the budget for 2013 to be settled with a crippled cabinet and upcoming elections? Professor Voermans argues that Dutch parliamentary history offers a precedent and some hope.
Friday the 13th is, arguably, not a bad day to introduce measures to prevent disasters from happening again. The Dutch Finance Minister, Jan-Kees de Jager, chose this day to introduce reforms in the banking and financial services industries.
Politicians get stuck in debates on benefit cuts and pension reforms. ‘Brussels’ of course sets some limits, but how about the European Convention on Human Rights? Can the lowering of pensions and the termination of benefits violate human rights?