leidenlawblog

Euthanasia as a Pro-Life Issue: What life do you want to lead?

Euthanasia as a Pro-Life Issue: What life do you want to lead?

Euthanasia and suicide are generally and mistakenly regarded as suspicious preferences for death over life. In fact voluntary ending of life may well be based on rational preferences for shorter and better lives over really unbearably longer lives.

Euthanasia is a reasonably relaxed issue in the Netherlands – as you probably know. Hopefully you’re not pondering this right now, that is to say considering or reconsidering your own existence. Still, if you should ever be confronted with a personal decision about euthanasia, any other assisted suicide or just suicide, the following comments may be helpful.

First a dangerous confusion must be put aside. Euthanasia is generally but wrongly regarded as a decision concerning life and death, or even worse, as a preference for death over life. This is reflected in the recent state commission report on “Completed life” (Voltooid leven”) which remained sceptical about euthanasia and the like as choices against life. What is more valuable than life itself? Is not the main measure of civilization and the rule of law the extent to which human life is protected?

Sure enough, but then the sanctity of life above the evil of death has got nothing to do with the issue of voluntary ending of life. As long as it remains completely unknown what it is to be dead (“I cannot be dead”) any choice between life and death is senseless in principle.

Adding to this experience is the fact that human life ends in death anyway sooner or later. So – and this is the main issue – euthanasia and other voluntary ending of life is, in principle, unrelated to any choice against life and for death “as such”. In fact ending your life, in as far as this can be rational at all, is going for a shorter and presumably better life against the prospect of a longer and rather less happy or even unbearable life. Why not shorten your life in the knowledge that otherwise a painful death will be a long and hard time in coming?

Thus, as such, any preference for natural death, even against human beings refusing to go on living, rests on a naturalistic fallacy (in fact much like some other so-called natural law conservatism in matters of abortion, birth, life, sex and death). Or: what makes an artificial death inherently less good or even evil, compared to any natural death?

Of course this does not condone murder and manslaughter in any way. But then the one and only overriding reason for condemning murder and manslaughter is the unwillingness of potential victims to die before their times.

Conceptualisation of euthanasia as a preference for one life-course over another is also not to suggest that such choices are straightforward. It may be nigh on impossible to predict one’s future life. On the other hand even young people may be subject to irreversible suffering, or may even lead no more than vegetative lives. May such merely vegetative lives be shortened even without the consent of the “living” involved? Does meaningful human life presuppose meaning in life? Or is this a slippery slope to socially indicated euthanasia?

Not all hard questions are answered by defining euthanasia and other voluntary ending of life in terms of life-courses: what life do I want to lead? Still, one legal implication may be that euthanasia and other assisted suicide are no longer issues of murder and manslaughter. Meaning, amongst other things, that assisted suicide ought not, in principle, to be a criminal offence.

The medical profession may no longer appeal to any Hippocratic oath prescribing the protection of life and thus prohibiting the killing of patients and people in general. Euthanasia and other voluntary ending of life are, in principle, about the quality of life, or: what is the best life to lead, given all humanly feasible possibilities? In fact the medical profession may be most valuable here in predicting the qualities of different life courses.

So let’s free euthanasia or any voluntary ending of life from the doom of death in principle. But do not step out of life till you’re really sure no more good is to come – or to be done. Talk about it if you think about it: you’re not alone.

1 Comment

Remond Judge

Euthanasia and Doctor-assisted suicide is a willing action taken by a person intended to take his own life, thereby putting an end to his miseries and problem in this world.

In most countries, euthanasia is illegal and can lead a victim to a jail sentence. In the United States, the law varies between states. In countries like Australia this drug is highly prohibited, https://ordernembutalaustralia.com/ Read more...

For long now euthanasia has been a controversial and arousing topic.

The question how and where to buy Suicide drugs has to lead many to search engines for answers today, however, you will find many articles talking on this particular topic and others offering to sell suicide drugs online. However, since suicide drugs are under lawful control it makes it difficult for seekers to easily lay hands on them since it will need a person like a doctor or a physician authorized by the law to administer or sell to the person in need.

Nembutal Pentobarbital (barbiturates) is well known as the drug for euthanasia which will make into sleep bring about your peaceful death.

However, patients with terminal diseases who wish to put an end to their suffering may not know how to lay hands on this suicide drug (Nembutal), but if you continue reading this article https://nembutalbook.com you will find out how people go purchasing Nembutal.

Add a comment

Related